Current:Home > ContactTokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages -WealthMindset Learning
Tokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages
View
Date:2025-04-18 09:04:55
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Tuesday held only the operator of the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant responsible for paying damages to dozens of evacuees.
The Tokyo High Court also slashed the amount to half of what the lower court had ordered and relieved the government of responsibility — a decision that plaintiffs and their lawyers criticized as belittling their suffering and the severity of the disaster.
The court ordered only the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, known as TEPCO, to pay a total of 23.5 million yen ($165,000) to 44 of the 47 plaintiffs, while not holding the government accountable.
Tuesday’s ruling apparently backpedaled from an earlier decision in March 2018, when the Tokyo District Court held both the government and TEPCO accountable for the disaster, which the ruling said could have been prevented if they both took better precautionary measures, ordering both to pay 59 million yen ($414,400) in damages.
The decision comes at a time when Japan’s government tries to accelerate reactor restarts to maximize nuclear energy to meet decarbonization targets, while seeking to tone down the impact of the nuclear disaster 13 years ago, and its memory gradually fades.
Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant melted after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, releasing massive amounts of radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point. About 27,000 of them are still unable to return home.
The government has pushed for the decontamination of affected areas and the reopening of no-go zones, and has urged evacuees to return to their homes while cutting back support for them. The government-set compensation program, which is mostly based on distance from the plant and radiation levels, has triggered divisions and discrimination among communities.
The dispute centers on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a massive tsunami, and whether the disaster could have been averted if the government had ordered the utility to take precautions.
In the ruling, judge Hiro Misumi said the flooding of the plant because of the tsunami wasn’t preventable even if the industry ministry used its authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami estimate at that time.
The decision is among the four rulings that apparently came in line with the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that said the government wasn’t liable for the disaster and that the disaster from a tsunami that high wasn’t foreseeable or preventable.
Motomitsu Nakagawa, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that Tuesday’s high court ruling was “almost a mere copy and paste” of the top court decision and that it “makes me infuriated.”
Nakagawa said the ruling takes the disaster-hit residents’ suffering lightly, and the reduction of the amount of compensation is also tantamount to saying that the operator can get away with paying only that much damage in a disaster.
He said that he planned to discuss a possible appeal to the Supreme Court after consulting with his clients.
Yuya Kamoshita, who has evacuated to Tokyo from Iwaki, south of the Fukushima Daiichi plant with his family, said the ruling was unacceptable because it trivialized the evacuees’ sufferings, and failed to hold the government accountable even though the nuclear power plant was operated as part of the national energy policy.
veryGood! (134)
Related
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- From the Middle East to East Baltimore, a Johns Hopkins Professor Works to Make the City More Climate-Resilient
- Is AI a job-killer or an up-skiller?
- Daniel Radcliffe Reveals Sex of His and Erin Darke’s First Baby
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Warming Trends: Bill Nye’s New Focus on Climate Change, Bottled Water as a Social Lens and the Coming End of Blacktop
- Daniel Radcliffe Shares Rare Insight Into His Magical New Chapter as a Dad
- Insurance firms need more climate change information. Scientists say they can help
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- How Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher Keep Pulling Off the Impossible for a Celebrity Couple
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Intel named most faith-friendly company
- 3 ways to protect your money if the U.S. defaults on its debt
- An Energy Transition Needs Lots of Power Lines. This 1970s Minnesota Farmers’ Uprising Tried to Block One. What Can it Teach Us?
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Biden’s Been in Office for More Than 500 Days. He Still Hasn’t Appointed a Top Official to Oversee Coal Mine Reclamation
- What the debt ceiling standoff could mean for your retirement plans
- Inside Clean Energy: Here Come the Battery Recyclers
Recommendation
Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
Lululemon’s Olympic Challenge to Reduce Its Emissions
What to know about the federal appeals court hearing on mifepristone
Light a Sparkler for These Stars Who Got Married on the 4th of July
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Elizabeth Holmes loses her latest bid to avoid prison
A brief biography of 'X,' the letter that Elon Musk has plastered everywhere
What if AI could rebuild the middle class?